B.S. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

B.S. v. State

990 So. 2d 608, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 13371, 2008 WL 3914846

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 27, 2008·No. No. 3D07-2088·Published

Opinion

CORRECTED OPINION

PER CURIAM.

We find the determination of delinquency is supported by legally sufficient evidence. See Melton v. State, 546 So.2d 444 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); State v. Woods, 624 So.2d 739 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993), review denied, 634 So.2d 629 (Fla.1994). However, because the trial court erroneously denied the juvenile-appellant opening and concluding final arguments as required by Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.110(d), D.B. v. State, 979 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008), the cause is remanded for further proceedings below consistent with D.B.

Remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CORRECTED OPINION

PER CURIAM.

We find the determination of delinquency is supported by legally sufficient evidence. See Melton v. State, 546 So.2d 444 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); State v. Woods, 624 So.2d 739 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993), review denied, 634 So.2d 629 (Fla.1994). However, because the trial court erroneously denied the juvenile-appellant opening and concluding final arguments as required by Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.110(d), D.B. v. State, 979 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008), the cause is remanded for further proceedings below consistent with D.B.

Remanded.

B.S. v. State, 990 So. 2d 608, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 13371, 2008 WL 3914846 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

990 So. 2d 608 (B.S. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related