B.S. v. State
This text of 990 So. 2d 608 (B.S. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CORRECTED OPINION
We find the determination of delinquency is supported by legally sufficient evidence. See Melton v. State, 546 So.2d 444 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); State v. Woods, 624 So.2d 739 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993), review denied, 634 So.2d 629 (Fla.1994). However, because the trial court erroneously denied the juvenile-appellant opening and concluding final arguments as required by Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.110(d), D.B. v. State, 979 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008), the cause is remanded for further proceedings below consistent with D.B.
Remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
990 So. 2d 608, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 13371, 2008 WL 3914846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bs-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.