Bryson v. Railway Co.
This text of 14 S.E. 630 (Bryson v. Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
This was an appeal from an order overruling an oral demurrer to a complaint which contained the same allegations as the complaint in Nance v. Georgia &c. Railway Company, ante 307, and the decision in this case simply referred to that as its decision here. Appellant further contended that his motion for non-suit should have been granted. It seems that after verdict for plaintiff, the presiding judge (Hudson) set aside the verdict and ordered a new trial. This court held, under the authority of Agnew v. Adams, 24 S. C., 86, that there could be no appeal from the refusal to grant a non-suit, as there was no final judgment. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 S.E. 630, 35 S.C. 608, 1892 S.C. LEXIS 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryson-v-railway-co-sc-1892.