Bryson v. Johnston
This text of 39 F. App'x 946 (Bryson v. Johnston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Lester Daniel Bryson and John Frank Bowen, North Carolina inmates, appeal the district court’s order dismissing their 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2002) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A(b)(l) (West Supp.2002) for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Bryson v. Johnston, No. CA-02-89-1-2 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 29, 2002). We further deny the pending motion for the appointment of counsel and for oral argument as the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 F. App'x 946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryson-v-johnston-ca4-2002.