Bryonna K. Jackson and Elijah M. Johnson v. SPCP Park Springs Owner, LLC D/B/A Twentyone15 Apartments
This text of Bryonna K. Jackson and Elijah M. Johnson v. SPCP Park Springs Owner, LLC D/B/A Twentyone15 Apartments (Bryonna K. Jackson and Elijah M. Johnson v. SPCP Park Springs Owner, LLC D/B/A Twentyone15 Apartments) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-23-00062-CV
BRYONNA K. JACKSON AND ELIJAH M. JOHNSON, APPELLANTS
V.
SPCP PARK SPRINGS OWNER, LLC D/B/A TWENTYONE15 APARTMENTS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2022-005471-1, Honorable Don Pierson, Presiding
March 15, 2023 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellants, Bryonna K. Jackson and Elijah M. Johnson, appeal from the trial
court’s Agreed Judgment. 1 The appellate record was originally due February 6, 2023.
The clerk’s record was filed by this deadline, but the reporter’s record was not. By letter
of February 15, 2023, we notified the reporter that the record was overdue and directed
1Originally appealed to the Second Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001. her to advise this Court of the status of the record by February 27. To date, the reporter’s
record has not been filed and the reporter has had no further communication with this
Court.
Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further
proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c) (“The trial and appellate courts are jointly
responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed.”); 37.3(a)(2) (requiring
appellate courts to “make whatever order is appropriate to avoid further delay and to
preserve the parties’ rights” when the appellate record is not timely filed). On remand,
the trial court shall determine the following:
(1) what tasks remain to complete the filing of the reporter’s record;
(2) why the reporter has not completed the necessary tasks;
(3) what amount of time is reasonably necessary for the completion of those
tasks; and
(4) whether the reporter can complete the tasks within the time the trial court
finds reasonable.
Should the trial court determine that the reporter will require more than thirty days
to complete, certify, and file the reporter’s record, it shall arrange for a substitute reporter
to do so. The trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary to address the
aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a
supplemental clerk’s record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by April 17,
2023.
2 Should the reporter file the record on or before March 29, 2023, she is directed to
immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the trial court shall not
be required to take any further action.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bryonna K. Jackson and Elijah M. Johnson v. SPCP Park Springs Owner, LLC D/B/A Twentyone15 Apartments, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryonna-k-jackson-and-elijah-m-johnson-v-spcp-park-springs-owner-llc-texapp-2023.