Bryner v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
This text of 691 A.2d 1013 (Bryner v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Before us are three consolidated appeals of Thomas Bryner, Roy A. Dougherty and Michael Prozzoly (collectively, Claimants), all of whom were denied unemployment compensation benefits by referees because they had insufficient wages to satisfy the financial eligibility requirements of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law,)1 because they were on workers’ compensation during their base year. The Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) affirmed the decision of each referee denying unemployment compensation benefits to each of the Claimants.2
The sole contention raised by all Claimants is that the 1993 amendment to Section 204 of the Workers’ Compensation Act,3 an amendment commonly referred to as “Act 44”,4 entitles unemployed claimants to use workers’ compensation benefits received in their [1015]*1015base year as wages for purposes of determining financial eligibility for unemployment compensation under the Unemployment Compensation Law.5
In order to be eligible for any amount of unemployment compensation benefits under Section 404(c) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 P.S. § 804(c), a claimant must meet two requirements. First, he or she must have sufficient qualifying wages under the table specified for Determination of Rate and Amount of Benefits in Section 404(e), 43 P.S. § 804(e), and second, he or she must have a sufficient number of “credit weeks” during a specified period of time. 43 P.S. § 804(c).
Along with another minor amendment which is not relevant here, Act 44 added a new subsection, subsection (b) to Section 204, which provides:
(b) For the exclusive purpose of determining eligibility under the “Unemployment Compensation Law,” weekly compensation paid to an employe under this act shall be deemed to be a credit week as that term is defined in the “Unemployment Compensation Law.” (emphasis ours.)
By the addition of subsection (b) to Section 204 of the Workers’ Compensation Act, Claimants contend that workers’ compensation benefits paid to them during their base year include both credit weeks and wages for purposes of determining eligibility for unemployment compensation benefits under Section 401 and 404 of the Unemployment Compensation Law. Though Claimants concede that the coverage of “wages” is not explicitly mentioned by the statute, they assert that because the Unemployment Compensation Law defines both “credit weeks” and “wages” as “remuneration for services”, that the legislative intent was to allow unemployment compensation claimants the right to include workers’ compensation benefits received in a base year to constitute wages for that year.
Resort to legislative intent through statutory construction principles to determine whether the General Assembly meant the addition of subsection (b) to Section 204 is only necessary if “credit week” as used by the Unemployment Compensation Law is ambiguous. “Credit week” as used in this subsection is not ambiguous because, like the term “wages,” it is a defined term in the Unemployment Compensation Law.6 When the General Assembly added subsection 204(b) to allow workers’ compensation benefits paid to be deemed a “credit week” for purposes of satisfying financial eligibility requirements under Section 404(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, it did so with the knowledge that both “credit weeks” and “wages” as defined in the Unemployment Compensation Law needed to be satisfied before unemployment compensation benefits could be granted. If it had wanted to give credit as “wages” under the Unemployment Compensation Law, it would have done so.
Because a claimant must establish that he both worked the required number of credit weeks and obtained the required amount of wages under Section 404(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, and Section 204(b) of the Workers’ Compensation Act has included only “credit week” and not “wages”, Claimants are not entitled to unemployment compensation benefits. Accordingly, the decision of the Board is affirmed.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 27th day of March, 1997, the decisions of the Unemployment Compen[1016]*1016sation Board of Review, No. B-339667, dated August 18, 1995, No. B-339681, dated August 18, 1995, and No. B340177, dated August 31, 1995, are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
691 A.2d 1013, 1997 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryner-v-unemployment-compensation-board-of-review-pacommwct-1997.