Bryn Mawr Trust Co. v. Baldt
This text of 111 A. 712 (Bryn Mawr Trust Co. v. Baldt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The first, second and fourth assignments of error are not in accordance with our rules, as they fail to set forth the order of which they complain. The third is to a portion of the opinion of the court below in passing upon defendants’ motion for judgment, but the order of the court on that motion is not disclosed by the assignment. As no one of the assignments disclosed anything to be reviewed, the appeal must be quashed, and it is so ordered.
Appeal quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
111 A. 712, 268 Pa. 237, 1920 Pa. LEXIS 663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryn-mawr-trust-co-v-baldt-pa-1920.