Bryfogle v. UA Foundation

115 F. App'x 396
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 14, 2004·No. No. 03-17083·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

R. Charles Bryfogle appeals pro se the district court’s order dismissing, pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr.P. 8006, his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s decision. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review for abuse of discretion, Fitzsimmons v. Nolden (In re Fitzsimmons), 920 F.2d 1468, 1471 (9th Cir.1990), and we affirm.

[397] Dismissal was proper because the record indicates that Bryfogle failed to file a designation of the bankruptcy court record within ten days of his appeal to the district court as required under Fed. R. Bankr.P. 8006 or even after having received a generous extension of time to file the designation and explicit order by the district court to do so. Accordingly, the district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Bryfogle’s appeal. See id:

We deny all pending motions.

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bryfogle v. UA Foundation, 115 F. App'x 396 (9th Cir. 2004).

115 F. App'x 396 (Bryfogle v. UA Foundation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fitzsimmons v. Nolden (In re Fitzsimmons)
920 F.2d 1468 (Ninth Circuit, 1990)