Bryfogle v. Arizona Board of Regents

32 F. App'x 955
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 16, 2002·No. No. 01-15907; D.C. No. CV-92-00182-JMR·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

R. Charles Bryfogle appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his motions for reconsideration of the portion of the court’s July 1999 judgment dismissing with prejudice his state law claims. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Bryfogle relief from the judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), In re Pacific Far East Lines, Inc. 889 F.2d 242, 250 (9th Cir.1989), nor in denying his untimely Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to amend the judgment, Commercial Space v. Boeing, 193 F.3d 1074, 1078 (9th Cir.1999).

We deny Bryfogle’s pending motions.

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bryfogle v. Arizona Board of Regents, 32 F. App'x 955 (9th Cir. 2002).

32 F. App'x 955 (Bryfogle v. Arizona Board of Regents) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Pacific Far East Lines, Inc.
889 F.2d 242 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)