Bryers v. Sokolow
This text of 181 A.D. 892 (Bryers v. Sokolow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that reversible error is presented by the appellant’s exceptions to the refusal of the trial court to instruct the jury, as requested, that “ the circumstances that the Magistrate held the plaintiff after an examination, after the hearing of all the witnesses, may be considered by them on the question of whether there was malice, or malice inferable from the absence or presence of probable cause.” Jenks, P. J., Stapleton, Mills, Rich and Blackmar, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
181 A.D. 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryers-v-sokolow-nyappdiv-1917.