Bryce Thomas Daniels v. University of Notre Dame
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION
BRYCE THOMAS DANIELS,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 3:22-CV-698-GSL-JEM
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME,
Defendant.
ORDER This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge John E. Martin’s report and recommendation entered on July 20, 2026. [DE 187]. For the reasons fully explained in the report, Judge Martin recommends that the Court grant the request contained within Defendant’s Bill of Costs, [DE 172], and allocate to Plaintiff costs in the amount of $4,241.80. [DE 187, Page 5]. Over fourteen days have passed without any objections being filed, so the Court reviews the report and recommendation for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999) (“If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.” (citations omitted)). The Court has reviewed the report and recommendation and finds no clear error. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Martin’s report and recommendation in full, GRANTS Defendant’s Bill of Costs, [DE 172], and ORDERS Plaintiff to pay costs in the amount of $4,241.80. SO ORDERED. ENTERED: August 12, 2026
/s/ GRETCHEN S. LUND Judge United States District Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bryce Thomas Daniels v. University of Notre Dame (Bryce Thomas Daniels v. University of Notre Dame) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.