Bryce Darec Clark v. State
This text of Bryce Darec Clark v. State (Bryce Darec Clark v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered March 8, 2019
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00944-CR
BRYCE DAREC CLARK, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 219-83633-2017
ORDER Before the Court is appellant’s March 6, 2019 second motion to extend the time to file
appellant’s brief. In the motion, attorney Kristin R. Brown states that she “was only recently
appointed to replace previous appellate counsel” in this appeal. Our records reflect Mitchell R.
Nolte is appellant’s counsel of record.
No motion to withdraw or motion to substitute counsel has been filed in this appeal. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5. Until such a motion is filed and granted by this Court, Kristin R. Brown is
not authorized to represent appellant. Accordingly, we DENY the motion.
We ORDER appellant to file either a motion to substitute counsel or else his appellate
brief within FOURTEEN DAYS of the date of this order. If appellant does not comply with this order, the appeal will be abated for a hearing in the trial court regarding appellant’s
representation.
We DIRECT the Clerk to transmit copies of this order to Mitchell R. Nolte, Kristin R.
Brown, and counsel for the State.
/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bryce Darec Clark v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryce-darec-clark-v-state-texapp-2019.