Bryant v. Whisenant

52 So. 525, 167 Ala. 325, 140 Am. St. Rep. 41, 1910 Ala. LEXIS 419
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMay 12, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 52 So. 525 (Bryant v. Whisenant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bryant v. Whisenant, 52 So. 525, 167 Ala. 325, 140 Am. St. Rep. 41, 1910 Ala. LEXIS 419 (Ala. 1910).

Opinion

ANDEESON, J.

It is manifest that chapter 41 of the Code of 1907, which relates to the public school system of the state, contemplates that tuition shall be absolutely free to all minors of the state over the age -of seven. We think, however, there is a well-defined distinction between tuition and a reasonable incidental fee for heating and lighting the schoolroom. — State ex rel. Priest v. University of Wisconsin, 54 Wis. 159, 11 N. W. 472. And when the statute makes no provision for a fund for this purpose, the county boards have the right to prescribe a reasonable method for the raising and collection of this fund, and to delegate the authority to the district boards and teachers to enforce said rules. We also think that the requirement of a reasonable incidental fee for this purpose, as a condition precendent [328]*328to attendance, is contemplated by the statute, in the absence of any special provision for same, and that the rule set up in special pleas 2 and 4 was a reasonable one, and a good defense to the plaintiff’s action. The trial court properly overruled the demurrers to these pleas, and the judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

D.owdell, C. J., and Simpson, McClellan, and Sayre, JJ., concur in the opinion and the conclusion. Mayfield, J., concurs in the conclusion, but does not think that the law contemplates free tuition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte James
713 So. 2d 869 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1997)
Alabama Coalition for Equity, Inc. v. James
713 So. 2d 869 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1997)
Baxley v. Rutland
409 F. Supp. 1249 (M.D. Alabama, 1976)
Shirey v. City Board of Education of Fort Payne
94 So. 2d 758 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1957)
State Ex Rel. Veeder v. State Board of Education
33 P.2d 516 (Montana Supreme Court, 1934)
Rheam v. Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma
1933 OK 29 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1933)
Hughes v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
134 So. 461 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1931)
Vincent v. County Board of Education
131 So. 893 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1931)
Kennedy v. County Board of Education
107 So. 907 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1926)
Hughes v. Outlaw
73 So. 16 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1916)
Ryan v. Sawyer
70 So. 652 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1916)
Roberson v. Oliver
66 So. 645 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1914)
Connell v. Gray
1912 OK 607 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Weaver v. Pepper
52 So. 754 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 So. 525, 167 Ala. 325, 140 Am. St. Rep. 41, 1910 Ala. LEXIS 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryant-v-whisenant-ala-1910.