Bryant v. Warden
This text of Bryant v. Warden (Bryant v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Mississippi primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION
QUANTREY BRYANT PETITIONER
V. CAUSE NO. 3:18-CV-126-CWR-JCG
WARDEN RESPONDENT
ORDER Before the Court is Quantrey Bryant’s objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. See Docket No. 16. On review, the undersigned cannot agree that the BOP Hearing Officer violated Mr. Bryant’s due process rights or displayed partiality. Even if Mr. Bryant had established such a violation, moreover, he has not shown that it caused him any prejudice, as required by Boatswain v. Martinez, 519 F. App’x 253, 253 (5th Cir. 2013), since he admitted to possessing the SIM cards. The Report and Recommendation is therefore adopted as this Court’s own Order, and this case is dismissed. A separate Final Judgment shall issue this day. SO ORDERED, this the 13th day of June, 2019. s/ Carlton W. Reeves UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bryant v. Warden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryant-v-warden-mssd-2019.