Bryant v. Walsh

863 So. 2d 1229, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19789, 2003 WL 23094662
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 31, 2003·No. No. 2D03-358·Published

Opinion

VILLANTI, Judge.

Walter Bryant appeals the trial court’s order granting a new trial based on its determination that the verdict entered in Bryant’s favor was against the manifest weight of the evidence. The order failed to provide express reasons from the record to support the conclusion that the verdict was against the manifest weight of the evidence. See Wackenhut Corp. v. Canty, 359 So.2d 430, 434 (Fla.1978); Hawk v. Seaboard Sys. R.R., 547 So.2d 669, 671 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). We conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in determining the verdict was against the manifest weight of the evidence. Accordingly, the order granting new trial is reversed and the cause remanded for reinstatement of the jury’s verdict.

Reversed and remanded.

WHATLEY and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bryant v. Walsh, 863 So. 2d 1229, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19789, 2003 WL 23094662 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

863 So. 2d 1229 (Bryant v. Walsh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wackenhut Corp. v. Canty
359 So. 2d 430 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)
Hawk v. Seaboard System RR, Inc.
547 So. 2d 669 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)