Bryant v. Tedder

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bryant v. Tedder

356 So. 2d 379, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15114

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 14, 1978·No. No. 78-85·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The issue involved in this cause is exactly the same as was decided in Morales v. Moore, 356 So.2d 829 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). Accordingly, we hereby exercise our discretion to treat the suggestion for writ of prohibition as a petition for writ of certiora-ri. For the reasons set out in Morales, the petition is granted; and the order denying the petitioner’s motion to strike is quashed, with directions that an order be entered excluding podiatrists from the list of prospective members of the medical mediation panel.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The issue involved in this cause is exactly the same as was decided in Morales v. Moore, 356 So.2d 829 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). Accordingly, we hereby exercise our discretion to treat the suggestion for writ of prohibition as a petition for writ of certiora-ri. For the reasons set out in Morales, the petition is granted; and the order denying the petitioner’s motion to strike is quashed, with directions that an order be entered excluding podiatrists from the list of prospective members of the medical mediation panel.

ALDERMAN, C. J., and ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.

Bryant v. Tedder, 356 So. 2d 379, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15114 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

356 So. 2d 379 (Bryant v. Tedder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related