Bryant v. Sylvester

Opinion

Opinions of the United

1995 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

6-1-1995

Bryant v Sylvester Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 94-1635

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995

Recommended Citation "Bryant v Sylvester" (1995). 1995 Decisions. Paper 127. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995/127

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1995 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 94-1635

___________

ANDRE M. BRYANT; FATHERS' CHILDREN'S EQUALITY, INC.

Appellees,

vs.

ESTHER R. SYLVESTER, HONORABLE, Administrative Judge-Family Division in her official and individual capacity; NANCY SOBOLEVITCH, ESQUIRE, Court Administrator in her official and individual capacity; GEOFF GALLAS, Executive Court Administrator in his official and individual capacity; MATTHEW TIERNEY, Court Administrator-Family Division in his official and individual capacity; JOSEPH DI PRIMIO, ESQUIRE, Court Administrator in his official and individual capacity; ANDREA HOFFMAN-JELIN, ESQUIRE, Director of Children and Youth Services in her official and individual capacity

Appellants.

___________

BEFORE: STAPLETON, ROTH and LEWIS, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

O R D E R

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The petition for panel rehearing is granted to permit amendment of the opinion. 2. The panel's opinion is vacated.

3. A revised panel opinion will be filed following circulation to the full court in accordance with IOP 9.4. 4. The application for rehearing in banc is dismissed as moot, but without prejudice to the filing of a new application for rehearing in banc in accordance with IOP 9.5.

BY THE COURT

/s/ Timothy K. Lewis

_________________________________

Circuit Judge

Dated: June 1, 1995