Bryant v. Stirling

CourtDistrict Court, D. South Carolina
DecidedNovember 15, 2021
Docket1:13-cv-02665-BHH
StatusUnknown

This text of Bryant v. Stirling (Bryant v. Stirling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bryant v. Stirling, (D.S.C. 2021).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION

James N. Bryant, III, ) Civil Action No. 1:13-2665-BHH ) Petitioner, ) vs. ) ) ORDER Bryan P. Stirling, Commissioner, ) South Carolina Department of ) Corrections; Warden, Kirkland ) Correctional Institution, ) ) Respondents. )

On March 19, 2019, the Court entered an Opinion and Order granting in part Petitioner James N. Bryan, III’s (“Petitioner”) amended petition for writ of habeas corpus and vacating his death sentence. (ECF No. 94.) On May 24, 2021, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals entered a Published Opinion reversing this Court’s rulings on Petitioner’s claims relating to Juror 342, and otherwise affirming. (ECF No. 112.) The Fourth Circuit remanded the case to this Court with the instruction to deny Petitioner’s application for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 with prejudice. (Id. at 29.) In accordance with this instruction, on May 26, 2021, the Court denied Petitioner’s § 2254 petition with prejudice. (ECF No. 113.) On November 15, 2021, after rehearing en banc, the Fourth Circuit issued a per curiam opinion vacating the panel opinions in Bryant v. Stephan, 998 F.3d 128 (4th Cir. 2021), and affirming the original judgment of this Court. Accordingly, the Court hereby vacates its own amended judgment dismissing this action with prejudice (ECF No. 114), reinstates this action, and reinstates its original judgment accepting in part the U.S. Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, granting in part Respondents’ motion for summary judgment, granting in part Petitioner’s amended § 2254 petition, and vacating the death sentence (ECF No. 95). IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Bruce Howe Hendricks United States District Judge

November 15, 2021 Charleston, South Carolina

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

James Bryant, III v. Michael Stephan
998 F.3d 128 (Fourth Circuit, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Bryant v. Stirling, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryant-v-stirling-scd-2021.