Bryant v. State
This text of 145 A.2d 777 (Bryant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case, the defendant appeared in court without counsel, plead guilty to one count of an indictment and was sen *152 tenced to four years’ confinement in the Maryland House of Correction.
He was not advised of his right to obtain counsel in accordance with Rule 723 b of the Maryland Rules; and the record not only fails to show affirmatively, compliance with Rule 723, but, on the contrary, shows a failure to comply therewith.
For the reasons set forth by Chief Judge Bruñe in the case of Hill v. State, 218 Md. 120, just decided, the judgment and sentence must be reversed and case remanded for a new trial.
Judgment and sentence reversed, and case remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
145 A.2d 777, 218 Md. 151, 1958 Md. LEXIS 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryant-v-state-md-1958.