Bryant v. State
This text of 140 S.E. 395 (Bryant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Under the facts of the case as disclosed by the record, the instructions of the court upon the law of voluntary manslaughter and conspiracy were' authorized, and were not erroneous for any reason assigned.
2. The theory that the accused shot and killed the deceased in defense of his (the accused’s) son was raised solely by the statement of the accused to the jury, and, in the absence of a timely and appropriate written request, the failure of the court to instruct the jury that if they found that the deceased was killed by the defendant in defense of his son the killing would be justifiable was not error.
3. The other grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial show no cause for a reversal of the judgment below.
4. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 S.E. 395, 37 Ga. App. 379, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryant-v-state-gactapp-1927.