Bryant v. State

165 S.E. 250, 175 Ga. 362, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 252
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bryant v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 180 Ga. 238
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 12, 1932·No. No. 8645·Published

Opinions

Beck, P. J.

1. Under the facts of the case, the court did not err in giving to the jury the instructions excepted to in the first and second grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial. They state correct principles of law and were authorized by the evidence in the case.

2. The additional instructions given to the jury at their request were not erroneous.

3 The evidence in the case was sufficient to authorize a verdict of guilty.

Judgment affirmed,.

All the Justices concur, except Bussell, O. J., and Gilbert, J., who dissent. E. 8. Taylor, John D. Taylor Jr., and Q. D. Rivers, for plaintiff in error. George M. Napier, attorney-general, M. Neil Andrews, solicitor-general, T. R. Gress, assistant attorney-general, and Dean Owens, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bryant v. State, 165 S.E. 250, 175 Ga. 362, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 252 (Ga. 1932).

165 S.E. 250 (Bryant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.