Bryant v. State
This text of 165 S.E. 250 (Bryant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
1. Under the facts of the case, the court did not err in giving to the jury the instructions excepted to in the first and second grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial. They state correct principles of law and were authorized by the evidence in the case.
2. The additional instructions given to the jury at their request were not erroneous.
3 The evidence in the case was sufficient to authorize a verdict of guilty.
Judgment affirmed,.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
165 S.E. 250, 175 Ga. 362, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryant-v-state-ga-1932.