Bryant v. State
This text of 25 S.E. 927 (Bryant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Whether or not admissions made by a person accused of crime relate to independent facts, proof of which would be admissible as circumstances tending to establish the hypothesis of guilt, or of themselves amount to an indirect confes- ' sion of guilt, is a question of fact for the jury, and the court having in effect so instructed them, did not, in either view of the matter, .err in submitting for their consideration- the weight of such admissions.
2. Treating the incriminating admissions either as relating to independent facts, or as bearing directly upon the question of guilt, the court’s instructions both upon the law as to confessions, and upon the degree of certainty required where a verdict of conviction is claimed upon circumstantial evidence, were full and correct.
3. There was no error in admitting evidence. The charges complained of, construed in the light of the entire charge given, were free from criticism; the evidence warranted the verdict, and there was no error in denying a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 S.E. 927, 97 Ga. 815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryant-v-state-ga-1896.