Bryant v. State

335 So. 2d 874, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 13969
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bryant v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 290 So. 2d 122
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 6, 1976·No. No. 74-1203·Published

Opinion

DOWNEY,. Judge.

By information the State of Florida charged Mattie Lou Thompson, Ira Belle Bryant and Walter J. Bryant with (1) bribery, and (2) with aiding or assisting in the setting up, promoting or conducting of a lottery.

Mattie Lou Thompson’s conviction of the second count was affirmed by this court on March 5, 1976, in Case No. 74-1321, 330 So.2d 33. The conviction of Walter J. Bryant on both counts was affirmed this date in Case No. 74-1202.

Our consideration of the record in this case leads us to the conclusion that there was sufficient evidence, if believed by the jury, to find appellant guilty of Count II of the information. However, there is absolutely no evidence of any sort reaching the quality necessary to convict appellant of the bribery count.

Accordingly, the conviction and sentence on Count I for bribery is reversed and the [875]*875conviction and sentence on Count II is affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.

WALDEN, C. J., and ULMER, RAY E„ Jr., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bryant v. State, 335 So. 2d 874, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 13969 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

335 So. 2d 874 (Bryant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.