Bryant v. State
87 Fla. 164
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bryant v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 89 Fla. 26 →
Opinion
The only question presented is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict,
The testimony for the State was uncontradieted and presents a strong ease of circumstantial evidence against the defendants.
We fail to see how the jury could have found any other verdict than that of guilt.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bryant v. State, 87 Fla. 164 (Fla. 1924).
87 Fla. 164 (Bryant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.