Bryant v. South Carolina Department of Transportation Commission

CourtDistrict Court, D. South Carolina
DecidedSeptember 6, 2019
Docket2:19-cv-02330
StatusUnknown

This text of Bryant v. South Carolina Department of Transportation Commission (Bryant v. South Carolina Department of Transportation Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bryant v. South Carolina Department of Transportation Commission, (D.S.C. 2019).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Anthony G. Bryant, ) Case No. 2:19-cv-2330-MBS-MGB ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ORDER South Carolina Department of ) Transportation, South Carolina ) Department of Commerce, Secretary ) of Trade of South Carolina, and South ) Carolina Department of Education, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________)

Plaintiff Anthony G. Bryant has filed a civil action. He is proceeding pro se, and he seeks permission to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Dkt. No. 3.) Plaintiff has a history of filing frivolous cases while proceeding IFP. Consequently, last year this Court entered a pre-filing injunction against Plaintiff pursuant to Graham v. Riddle, 554 F.2d 133, 134-135 & n.* (4th Cir. 1977). See Bryant v. U.S. Dep’t of Interior, No. 2:18-cv-2593- MBS, 2018 WL 5255009, at *1 (D.S.C. Oct. 22, 2018), aff’d sub nom. Bryant v. U.S. Dep’t of Educ., 764 F. App’x 344 (4th Cir. 2019), pet. for cert. docketed (May 14, 2019). In keeping with that injunction, the Court has since denied Plaintiff IFP status in a subsequent case. See Bryant v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs, No. 2:18-cv-3037-MBS (D.S.C. Nov. 28, 2018), aff’d, 754 F. App’x 206 (4th Cir. 2019), cert. denied, No. 18-8905, 2019 WL 1767167 (U.S. June 24, 2019). The injunction requires Plaintiff to pay the full filing fee before he may proceed with a civil action.1 If he pays the full filing fee within fifteen days of this order, this case will proceed to initial review. If he does not, this civil action will be summarily dismissed. IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Margaret B. Seymour Senior United States District Judge

September 5, 2019

Charleston, South Carolina

1 The Clerk of Court has assigned a civil action number for docket-control purposes.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Graham v. Riddle
554 F.2d 133 (Fourth Circuit, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Bryant v. South Carolina Department of Transportation Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryant-v-south-carolina-department-of-transportation-commission-scd-2019.