Bryant v. Robert S. Fisher, Inc.
599 So. 2d 285, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6645, 1992 WL 123432
Opinion
Appellants/plaintiffs appeal from a final judgment entered following the grant of appellee/defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We reverse.
The trial court erred in basing its summary judgment ruling on the defendant’s “uncontroverted expert testimony.” The plaintiffs in this case presented evidence which directly conflicted with the expert testimony, thereby showing that a genuine issue of material fact existed. Summary judgment was therefore improper. See Thrasher v. Koehring Co., 543 So.2d 754 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bryant v. Robert S. Fisher, Inc., 599 So. 2d 285, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6645, 1992 WL 123432 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
599 So. 2d 285 (Bryant v. Robert S. Fisher, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thrasher v. Koehring Company
543 So. 2d 754 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)