Bryant v. Private Investigator's Licensing Board

549 P.2d 327, 92 Nev. 278, 1976 Nev. LEXIS 586
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedMay 13, 1976
DocketNo. 8205
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 549 P.2d 327 (Bryant v. Private Investigator's Licensing Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bryant v. Private Investigator's Licensing Board, 549 P.2d 327, 92 Nev. 278, 1976 Nev. LEXIS 586 (Neb. 1976).

Opinion

[279]*279OPINION

Per Curiam:

The Private Investigator’s Licensing Board found Irelene B. Bryant guilty of unprofessional conduct and unfitness as a licensee and imposed a 90-day suspension of her license. Upon review, the district court affirmed, and in this appeal Ms. Bryant contends the record does not support the findings of fact and conclusions of law and the penalty imposed constitutes an abuse of discretion. We disagree.

In reviewing an administrative board’s decision this court, like the district court, is limited to the record presented below and to the determination of whether the board acted arbitrarily or capriciously. Lellis v. Archie, 89 Nev. 550, 516 P.2d 469 (1973).

Unchallenged evidence in the record clearly establishes that Ms. Bryant failed to report the employment of an unlicensed investigator, one James Corbett, Jr., although required to do so by NRS 648.140(2).1

Further, the record establishes that after being discharged from an investigation, Ms. Bryant caused her employees to compile an “officers’ report” on one Iris Saxton, a former client. This report contained personal derogatory information on Iris Saxton which Ms. Bryant acquired as a result of the [280]*280employment relationship. Without obtaining Iris Saxton’s permission, Ms. Bryant furnished the report to Iris Saxton’s former husband, contrary to the provisions of NRS 648.200.2

Substantial evidence exists to support the board’s findings and under these circumstances we do not consider the 90 day suspension excessive. Miller v. Munger, 88 Nev. 405, 498 P.2d 1336 (1972).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Turk v. Nevada State Prison
575 P.2d 599 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
549 P.2d 327, 92 Nev. 278, 1976 Nev. LEXIS 586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryant-v-private-investigators-licensing-board-nev-1976.