Bryant v. Pet Milk Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Bryant v. Pet Milk Co.

143 S.E.2d 27, 111 Ga. App. 675, 1965 Ga. App. LEXIS 1063

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 12, 1965

Docket41294

StatusPublished

This text of 143 S.E.2d 27 (Bryant v. Pet Milk Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bryant v. Pet Milk Co., 143 S.E.2d 27, 111 Ga. App. 675, 1965 Ga. App. LEXIS 1063 (Ga. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Ebkrhardt, Judge.

Plaintiff sought recovery of damages to his automobile caused when it collided with a truck of one defendant driven by the other. The truck had been stopped on the inside lane going north on a four-lane street preparatory to making a left turn into a driveway that was momentarily blocked by a vehicle coming out, and plaintiff began passing the truck on the left when the bumper of the track struck the right side of the car. The case was tried before a judge without a jury who, after hearing the conflicting evidence as to the manner in which the accident occurred, and as to whether plaintiff’s negligence may have been the sole cause of the damage, rendered judgment for the defendant. The general grounds are without merit. Stapleton v. Amerson, 96 Ga. App. 471 (3b, 5a) (100 SE2d 628).

Judgment affirmed.

Nichols, P. J., and Pannell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ebkrhardt, Judge.

Plaintiff sought recovery of damages to his automobile caused when it collided with a truck of one defendant driven by the other. The truck had been stopped on the inside lane going north on a four-lane street preparatory to making a left turn into a driveway that was momentarily blocked by a vehicle coming out, and plaintiff began passing the truck on the left when the bumper of the track struck the right side of the car. The case was tried before a judge without a jury who, after hearing the conflicting evidence as to the manner in which the accident occurred, and as to whether plaintiff’s negligence may have been the sole cause of the damage, rendered judgment for the defendant. The general grounds are without merit. Stapleton v. Amerson, 96 Ga. App. 471 (3b, 5a) (100 SE2d 628).

Judgment affirmed.

Nichols, P. J., and Pannell, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 S.E.2d 27, 111 Ga. App. 675, 1965 Ga. App. LEXIS 1063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryant-v-pet-milk-co-gactapp-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack