Bryant v. National Aeronautics & Space Administration

38 F. App'x 8
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedApril 22, 2002
DocketNo. 01-5424
StatusPublished

This text of 38 F. App'x 8 (Bryant v. National Aeronautics & Space Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bryant v. National Aeronautics & Space Administration, 38 F. App'x 8 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See Fed. R.App. P. 36; D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s judgment of November 1, 2001, be affirmed. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). See Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33, 112 S.Ct. 1728, 118 L.Ed.2d 340 (1992).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Denton v. Hernandez
504 U.S. 25 (Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 F. App'x 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryant-v-national-aeronautics-space-administration-cadc-2002.