Bryant v. Miller

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided February 2, 2021·No. 7:18-cv-10198·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK THOMAS BRYANT, Plaintiff, -against- 18 CIVIL 10198 (KMK) JUDGMENT MICHAEL CAPRA, Superintendent; MS. HICKSON, Defendant.

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated February 1, 2021, Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss is granted. Plaintiff's claims are dismissed with prejudice. This is the second time adjudicating his claims, and Plaintiff has not fixed the problems identified by the Court in the January Opinion. See Denny v. Barber, 576 F.2d 465, 471 (2d Cir. 1978) (holding that the plaintiff was not entitled to "a third go-around"); Melvin v. County of Westchester, No. 14-CV-2995, 2016 WL 1254394, at *24n.19 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 29, 2016) (granting motion to dismiss with prejudice where "[the] [p]laintiff has already had two bites at the apple, and they have proven fruitless" (citation, alterations and quotation marks omitted)); accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York February 2, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: aK . AN ANGO Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bryant v. Miller, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Bryant v. Miller (Bryant v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Denny v. Barber
576 F.2d 465 (Second Circuit, 1978)