Bryant v. McDonough

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bryant v. McDonough

932 So. 2d 449, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8555, 2006 WL 1468870

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 31, 2006

DocketNo. 1D06-1449

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 932 So. 2d 449 (Bryant v. McDonough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bryant v. McDonough, 932 So. 2d 449, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8555, 2006 WL 1468870 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus/prohibition is denied on the merits. To the extent the petition can be interpreted as seeking certiorari review of certain interlocutory orders of the circuit court, we decline to undertake such review since petitioner will have an adequate remedy by way of appeal following the entry of a final order. See generally Noack v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., 872 So.2d 370 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). Finally, we deny petitioner’s request that we undertake review of the order granting him leave to proceed as an indigent in the circuit court, again without prejudice to his right to seek review on plenary appeal. See LaMadline v. Crosby, 867 So.2d 552 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

ALLEN, WEBSTER, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus/prohibition is denied on the merits. To the extent the petition can be interpreted as seeking certiorari review of certain interlocutory orders of the circuit court, we decline to undertake such review since petitioner will have an adequate remedy by way of appeal following the entry of a final order. See generally Noack v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., 872 So.2d 370 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). Finally, we deny petitioner’s request that we undertake review of the order granting him leave to proceed as an indigent in the circuit court, again without prejudice to his right to seek review on plenary appeal. See LaMadline v. Crosby, 867 So.2d 552 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004).

ALLEN, WEBSTER, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

932 So. 2d 449, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8555, 2006 WL 1468870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryant-v-mcdonough-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack