Bryant v. H. Rosenbaum & Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Bryant v. H. Rosenbaum & Co.

62 Miss. 191

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1884

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 62 Miss. 191 (Bryant v. H. Rosenbaum & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bryant v. H. Rosenbaum & Co., 62 Miss. 191 (Mich. 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

Cooper, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

No bill of exceptions was taken embodying the evidence introduced in support of the motion to set aside the pro confesso. Admitting that the affidavits which appear in the record do not show good cause for setting aside the decree, non constat that there was other testimony offered which warranted such action, and in the absence of an affirmative showing that all the testimony appears in the record, we must, in support of the decree, assume that there was such other evidence.

The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooper, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

No bill of exceptions was taken embodying the evidence introduced in support of the motion to set aside the pro confesso. Admitting that the affidavits which appear in the record do not show good cause for setting aside the decree, non constat that there was other testimony offered which warranted such action, and in the absence of an affirmative showing that all the testimony appears in the record, we must, in support of the decree, assume that there was such other evidence.

The decree is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 Miss. 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryant-v-h-rosenbaum-co-miss-1884.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack