Bryant v. Guaranty Security Insurance
176 So. 2d 505, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3196
Opinions
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bryant v. Guaranty Security Insurance, 176 So. 2d 505, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3196 (Fla. 1965).
176 So. 2d 505 (Bryant v. Guaranty Security Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ganzer v. Ganzer
84 So. 2d 591 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)
Batteiger v. Batteiger
109 So. 2d 602 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Cortina v. Cortina
98 So. 2d 334 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)
Morrison v. Morrison
122 So. 2d 199 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Kroier v. Kroier
116 So. 753 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)
Eldridge, Dunham & Co. v. Post
20 Fla. 579 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1884)
Jappe v. Heller
65 So. 2d 302 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1953)
Scheuermann v. Shamas
97 So. 2d 314 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1957)