Bryant v. farley/westpoint Stevens, Inc.

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedDecember 11, 2001
DocketI.C. NOS. 335570 857565
StatusPublished

This text of Bryant v. farley/westpoint Stevens, Inc. (Bryant v. farley/westpoint Stevens, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bryant v. farley/westpoint Stevens, Inc., (N.C. Super. Ct. 2001).

Opinion

Upon review of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good grounds to receive further evidence or to rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission affirms and adopts the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner.

***********
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner and in a Pre-Trial Agreement admitted into evidence as Stipulated Exhibit 1, as:

STIPULATIONS
1. All parties are properly before the North Carolina Industrial Commission and are subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act.

2. On 11 December 1992, an employment relationship existed between plaintiff and defendant Westpoint Stevens.

3. On 11 December 1992, defendant Westpoint Stevens was self-insured with Constitution State Service Company as the servicing agent.

4. On 11 December 1992, plaintiff's average weekly wage was $323.60 yielding a compensation rate of $215.74 per week.

5. On 11 December 1992, plaintiff sustained a compensable injury to his right arm arising out of and in the course of his employment with defendant Westpoint Stevens, Inc. This claim was the subject of an Opinion and Award filed 9 January 1997 by Deputy Commissioner Phillip A. Holmes, of which the Full Commission takes Judicial Notice and is incorporated in its entirety herein. Additionally, the transcript of that hearing before Deputy Commissioner Holmes and the medical deposition of Dr. Paul Rush conducted on 20 September 1996 are included as a part of the record for this Opinion and Award.

6. On 27 May 1998, an employment relationship existed between plaintiff and defendant-employer American Defender Services.

7. On 27 May 1998, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company was the carrier at risk with respect to defendant-employer American Defender Services.

8. Plaintiff's average weekly wage on 27 May 1998 will be determined by an Industrial Commission Form 22, admitted into evidence as Stipulated Exhibit 4.

9. Plaintiff's medicals with regard to this claim are admitted into evidence as Stipulated Exhibit 2.

10. Plaintiff's 9 October 1998 Recorded Statement is admitted into evidence as Stipulated Exhibit 3.

11. Plaintiff's Employment Security Commission records, received following the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, are admitted into evidence.

12. The Full Commission takes Judicial Notice of the Industrial Commission Forms 28B and 33 filed with respect to this case.

13. The depositions of Dr. Paul Rush conducted 10 September 1999, and Dr. Mark Brenner conducted 4 May 2000, are admitted into evidence.

***********
RULINGS ON EVIDENTIARY MATTERS
The objections contained in the depositions of Dr. Paul Rush and Dr. Mark Brenner are ruled upon in accordance with the applicable provisions of the law and the Opinion and Award in this case.

***********
Based upon all of the competent evidence in the record and reasonable inferences drawn therefrom, the Full Commission enters the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. On 11 December 1992, plaintiff was a 31 year old male employed by defendant Westpoint Stevens as a lift truck operator. On that date, plaintiff sustained a compensable injury to his right arm when the power steering of the lift truck failed to operate properly causing plaintiff to jerk his right arm. As a result of this accident, plaintiff sustained a torn rotator cuff.

2. On 19 January 1995, plaintiff underwent an open right rotator cuff repair with open anterior inferior acromioplasty, performed by Dr. Paul Rush.

3. As a result of plaintiff's 11 December 1992 injury by accident, plaintiff received temporary total disability from 19 January 1995 through 2 May 1995, pursuant to the Opinion and Award filed 9 January 1997 by Deputy Commissioner Phillip A. Holmes. Plaintiff also retained an 8% permanent partial disability to his right arm which he received from defendant Westpoint Stevens pursuant to the same Opinion and Award.

4. Plaintiff returned to work for defendant Westpoint Stevens on 2 May 1995, as a lift truck operator earning the same or greater wages than he had earned prior to 11 December 1992. Plaintiff remained employed in that capacity until he was terminated on 10 December 1996 for a positive random drug test, which was unrelated to his compensable injury.

5. From 2 May 1995 through 10 December 1996 plaintiff performed his regular duties with defendant Westpoint Stevens but still suffered from burning and aching in his right shoulder with increased activity. Plaintiff is right-hand dominant.

6. Plaintiff sought additional treatment from Dr. Paul Rush on 20 July 1995 and 14 September 1995. Dr. Rush treated plaintiff with anti-inflammatories for the aching pain. At that time plaintiff had good range of motion.

7. Plaintiff found employment with Asplundh Tree Company as a flagman in January 1997, after his discharge from defendant Westpoint Stevens in December 1996. Plaintiff's duties included holding a stop sign and flagging traffic. These duties did not require plaintiff to move his right arm to any extent, but plaintiff continued to suffer the same shoulder discomfort and neck soreness he had experienced the latter part of 1995. In December 1997, plaintiff was laid off from his position with Asplundh Tree Company.

8. On 16 March 1998, plaintiff became employed with defendant-employer American Defender Services as a can kruncher operator at the Campbell Soup Company in Maxton, North Carolina. At that time defendant-employer Defender Services was under contract with Campbell Soup to supply labor. Campbell Soup maintained the kruncher machine which was a prototype, and Campbell Soup had a patent on its design and operation.

9. The job duties of a kruncher operator are to retrieve damaged/defective goods with a forklift and load them onto a pallet. The cases of product are then placed on a pallet beside the recycling dumpster. Plaintiff would unwrap the damaged goods and break the cases away from the product and wrap and drop the cans down into a dumpster. Once the dumpster was full, plaintiff utilized a forklift to dump the dumpster into the hopper. On occasion, plaintiff would have to go up on a six-foot high platform and use a ten-pound pole to move the cans around the hopper to avoid clogging the kruncher.

10. As a can kruncher operator, plaintiff was required to lift various weights and sizes of cans. The weight of each can was between eleven to nineteen ounces. Cases ranged from 12 to 24 cans per case. Each pallet contained eight cases on an average. Plaintiff normally destroyed three to four pallets of damaged products per day.

11. Although plaintiff worked eight hours per day, the can kruncher machine was only in operation for four hours per day. Plaintiff's additional time each day was spent sweeping or hosing down the waste dock.

12. Between 16 March 1998 and 19 May 1998, plaintiff began experiencing burning and soreness in his shoulder. On 19 May 1998, plaintiff's pain progressed, and he was out of work until he saw Dr. Paul Rush on 27 May 1998.

13. On 27 May 1998 Dr. Rush treated plaintiff with a cortisone shot. The shot originally numbed plaintiff's shoulder, but by afternoon the pain was worse and his shoulder began to stiffen. Dr. Rush's visit was paid for by defendant Westpoint Stevens. Dr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 97-2
North Carolina § 97-2(6)
§ 97-25
North Carolina § 97-25
§ 97-29
North Carolina § 97-29
§ 97-31
North Carolina § 97-31(13)
§ 97-47
North Carolina § 97-47
§ 97-53
North Carolina § 97-53(13)
§ 97-57
North Carolina § 97-57

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Bryant v. farley/westpoint Stevens, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryant-v-farleywestpoint-stevens-inc-ncworkcompcom-2001.