Bryant v. Colvin

Fourth Circuit

Bryant v. Colvin

575 F. App'x 189

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 18, 2014

DocketNo. 13-2364

StatusPublished

This text of 575 F. App'x 189 (Bryant v. Colvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bryant v. Colvin, 575 F. App'x 189 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Alice Bryant appeals the district court’s order upholding the Commissioner’s denial of Bryant’s applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bryant v. Colvin, No. 1:13-cv00012-MOC, 2013 WL 5540296 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 8, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Alice Bryant appeals the district court’s order upholding the Commissioner’s denial of Bryant’s applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bryant v. Colvin, No. 1:13-cv00012-MOC, 2013 WL 5540296 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 8, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

575 F. App'x 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryant-v-colvin-ca4-2014.