Bryant v. City of New York

252 A.D.2d 777, 676 N.Y.S.2d 267, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8329
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 16, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 252 A.D.2d 777 (Bryant v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bryant v. City of New York, 252 A.D.2d 777, 676 N.Y.S.2d 267, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8329 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Crew III, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed October 30, 1997, which ruled that claimant did not sustain a causally related disability and denied her claim for workers’ compensation benefits.

Based upon our review of the record as a whole, we find that there is substantial evidence to support the Workers’ Compensation Board’s finding that claimant, a word processor, did not suffer from an occupational disease. To establish an occupational disease, claimant was required to demonstrate a “ ‘recognizable link’ ” between the disease from which she allegedly suffers and some distinctive feature of her employment (see, Matter of Knapp v Vestal Cent. School Dist., 247 AD2d 667, 668). In this regard, the Court of Appeals has emphasized that “[a]n ‘occupational disease’ ” derives from the very nature of the employment, not a specific condition peculiar to the employee’s place of work” (Matter of Mack v County of Rock-land, 71 NY2d 1008, 1009 [emphasis in original]). Here, claimant’s proof (at best) establishes that her neck, shoulder and back ailments stem from the type of chair in which she sat and the physical layout of her work area. As such conditions plainly relate to claimant’s particular work area and not the [778]*778very nature of her employment, we find that the Board properly denied claimant’s application for benefits. Claimant’s remaining contentions have been examined and found to be lacking in merit.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Yonkosky v. Town of Hamburg
2018 NY Slip Op 586 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
In re the Claim of Engler v. United Parcel Service
1 A.D.2d 854 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Aldrich v. St. Joseph's Hospital
305 A.D.2d 908 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Claim of Martin v. Fulton City School District
300 A.D.2d 901 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Claim of the Estate of Cagle v. White Auto Parts
297 A.D.2d 897 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Claim of Currier v. Manpower, Inc.
280 A.D.2d 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Claim of Demers v. St. Lawrence Psychiatric Center
271 A.D.2d 857 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Claim of Cocco v. New York City Department of Transportation
266 A.D.2d 634 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Claim of Leventer v. Yeshiva of Flatbush
257 A.D.2d 903 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Claim of Bates v. Marine Midland Bank
256 A.D.2d 948 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 A.D.2d 777, 676 N.Y.S.2d 267, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryant-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1998.