Bryant v. City of Cayce

421 F. App'x 313
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bryant v. City of Cayce. Read the opinion of the Court — 332 F. App'x 129
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 7, 2011·No. No. 10-1682·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Brenda Bryant appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and conclude there was no reversible error in any of the district court’s dispositive rulings. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bryant v. City of Cayce, No. 3:06-cv-00333-MJP (D.S.C. Oct. 24, 2007 & May 19, 2010). We further deny as moot Bryant’s motion to hold this appeal in abeyance pending the district court’s resolution of her Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration. Finally, we deny Bryant’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bryant v. City of Cayce, 421 F. App'x 313 (4th Cir. 2011).

421 F. App'x 313 (Bryant v. City of Cayce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related