Bryant v. Bryant

216 N.W.2d 162, 191 Neb. 539, 1974 Neb. LEXIS 903
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 21, 1974
Docket39245
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 216 N.W.2d 162 (Bryant v. Bryant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bryant v. Bryant, 216 N.W.2d 162, 191 Neb. 539, 1974 Neb. LEXIS 903 (Neb. 1974).

Opinion

Boslaugh, J.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment denying the defendant’s petition for modification of an alimony judgment. The petition for modification alleged the remarriage of the plaintiff and other changes in circumstances.

The parties were divorced on July 21, 1965. The decree approved a property settlement agreement between the parties which was incorporated by reference in the decree. The agreement provided the defendant Would pay $150 per month to .the plaintiff for a period of 8 years commencing the month following the date all the children of the parties attained the age of 18 years, married, died, or became self-supporting. The question presented is whether the alimony award was subject to modification.

■: An unqualified allowance of alimony in gross made before July 6, 1972, whether payable immediately in *540 full or periodically in installments, and whether intended solely as a property settlement or as an allowance for support, or both, is not subject to modification. Ziegenbein v. Damme, 138 Neb. 320, 292 N. W. 921; Ball v. Ball, 183 Neb. 216, 159 N. W. 2d 297; Karrer v. Karrer, 190 Neb. 610, 211 N. W. 2d 116. The present statute, section 42-365, R. S. Supp., 1972, is not applicable to judgments entered prior to July 6, 1972. Karrer v. Karrer, supra.

There was no provision in the decree or the property settlement agreement to indicate the payments due the plaintiff were intended as anything other than “alimony in gross.” There was no provision regarding the death of the parties or the remarriage of the plaintiff. The trial court made no reservation of the power to modify. We conclude the award was not subject to modification.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Watley v. Watley
302 N.W.2d 690 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1981)
Bernstein v. Commissioner
1978 T.C. Memo. 84 (U.S. Tax Court, 1978)
Kasper v. Kasper
240 N.W.2d 591 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 N.W.2d 162, 191 Neb. 539, 1974 Neb. LEXIS 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryant-v-bryant-neb-1974.