Bryant v. Bryant

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Bryant v. Bryant

615 A.2d 1046, 224 Conn. 905, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 367

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedOctober 13, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 615 A.2d 1046 (Bryant v. Bryant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bryant v. Bryant, 615 A.2d 1046, 224 Conn. 905, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 367 (Colo. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 910, is granted, limited to the following questions:

“1. Was the Appellate Court correct in rejecting the plaintiffs claim that the trial court, under General Statutes § 46b-8, improperly refused to consider the plaintiff’s motion for modification simultaneously with the defendant’s motion for contempt?

“2. Was the Appellate Court correct in rejecting the plaintiff’s claim that the trial court’s finding of contempt was not based on sufficient evidence?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 910, is granted, limited to the following questions:

“1. Was the Appellate Court correct in rejecting the plaintiffs claim that the trial court, under General Statutes § 46b-8, improperly refused to consider the plaintiff’s motion for modification simultaneously with the defendant’s motion for contempt?

“2. Was the Appellate Court correct in rejecting the plaintiff’s claim that the trial court’s finding of contempt was not based on sufficient evidence?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

615 A.2d 1046, 224 Conn. 905, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryant-v-bryant-conn-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack