Bryant v. Barnes

438 S.W.2d 435
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 30, 1968·No. 4739·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

WILSON, Justice.

The Mayor appealed from an order granting a temporary injunction restraining him from holding a hearing. The action in which this interlocutory order was entered is one for declaratory judgment.

The sole function of a temporary injunction is to preserve the status quo pending final determination. Janus Films, Inc, v. City of Fort Worth, 163 Tex. 616, 358 S.W.2d 589.

By certified copy of judgment it appears that final determination of this cause was made September 23, 1968, and we now have no jurisdiction to review the interlocutory order, the temporary injunction appeal having become moot. International Ass’n, etc. v. Federal Ass’n, etc., 133 Tex. 624, 130 S.W.2d 282.

The temporary injunction case and the appeal are dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bryant v. Barnes, 438 S.W.2d 435 (Tex. Ct. App. 1968).

438 S.W.2d 435 (Bryant v. Barnes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. Moore
912 S.W.2d 860 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Chair King, Inc.
827 S.W.2d 546 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)
State v. Garza
774 S.W.2d 724 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1989)
EMW Manufacturing Co. v. Lemons
741 S.W.2d 212 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Independent American Real Estate, Inc. v. Davis
735 S.W.2d 256 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)
Texas City v. Community Public Service Co.
534 S.W.2d 412 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1976)