Bryant v. Barnes
This text of 433 S.W.2d 786 (Bryant v. Barnes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
This is an appeal by intervenors from an order dismissing their plea of intervention. The appeal is dismissed.
Four persons, alleging they are members of the city council of the city of Beverly Hills, filed a petition seeking a declaratory judgment involving construction of Art. 5992, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.Stat., and praying for a temporary injunction restraining defendant Mayor from conducting a hearing on charges filed against members of the council.
After the Mayor answered, four persons (alleging they were the petitioners who had filed the petition for removal of the city council members which was the subject matter of the hearing sought to be enjoined) filed the petition in intervention alleging they were class representatives. They prayed dismissal of the action for want of jurisdiction. Their plea in intervention was dismissed on motion.
The order of dismissal is not an appeal-able judgment; it is an interlocutory order. This court has no jurisdiction of the appeal. Kimmel v. Lytton, Tex.Civ.App., 371 S.W.2d 927, writ ref., and cases cited.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
433 S.W.2d 786, 1968 Tex. App. LEXIS 2485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryant-v-barnes-texapp-1968.