Bryant v. Abbot

22 N.H. 216
Superior Court of New Hampshire·Decided December 15, 1850·Published

Opinion

Dell, J.

Such an 'injunction is neither by its precept nor by the practice of the Court, a returnable process; and the marshal is entitled to his fees for the service, without showing it to be returned, but is entitled to no fees for such return. A payment of the funds of the estate into the Court, without designating any part as paid for the use of the marshal or his deputy, would not be a payment to the plaintiff. The funds so returned would be, of course, distributed to the bankrupt’s creditors.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bryant v. Abbot, 22 N.H. 216 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1850).

22 N.H. 216 (Bryant v. Abbot) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.