Bryant Moore v. Lightstorm Entertainment, Inc.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2159

BRYANT MOORE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LIGHTSTORM ENTERTAINMENT, INC., (“Lightstorm”); JAMES CAMERON, (“Cameron”); TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, (“Fox”),

Defendants – Appellees,

And

20TH CENTURY FOX FILM, INC.; JAMES CAMERON, III,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. (8:11-cv-03644-RWT)

Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 14, 2016

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bryant Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Rotstein, MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP, Los Angeles, California; J. Matthew Williams, MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Bryant Moore appeals the district court’s order granting

the Appellees’ motion for attorney’s fees and costs under 17

U.S.C. § 505 (2012), and denying Moore’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(d)

motion to vacate the court’s prior order granting summary

judgment in favor of the Appellees on Moore’s copyright

infringement claims. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and

conclude that the district court did not err. Accordingly, we

affirm the district court’s order and deny Moore’s motion to

stay proceedings related to the fee award pending appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED