Bryant Kessler Jones v. State
Opinion
NOS. 07-10-0418-CR 07-10-0419-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL C
JUNE 3, 2011 ______________________________
BRYANT KESSLER JONES,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
_________________________________
FROM THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. TWO OF TARRANT COUNTY;
NOS. 1207009R & 1208348R; HON. WAYNE SALVANT, PRESIDING _______________________________
ABATEMENT AND REMAND _______________________________
Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
Bryant Kessler Jones, appellant, appeals his convictions for engaging in
organized criminal activity. Appellant timely perfected his appeals. The clerk’s record
was filed on November 4, 2010, and the reporter’s record on March 3, 2011.
Appellant’s brief was due on April 4, 2011. On April 13, 2011, the court sent a letter to
counsel for appellant notifying her that the brief was overdue and that it or a response
was due on April 25, 2011. Counsel filed a request to extend the time to file the brief which was granted to May 25, 2011. To date, no brief nor an extension to file the brief
has been filed. It appears as though appellant or his counsel simply ignored the
deadlines previously imposed.
Those convicted of criminal acts are entitled to effective assistance of counsel on
appeal. The failure of counsel to timely prosecute an appeal falls short of rendering
such assistance. Consequently, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the
Criminal District Court No. Two of Tarrant County (trial court) for further proceedings.
Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given
and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine 1) whether appellant desires to
prosecute this appeal, 2) whether appellant is indigent and entitled to appointed
counsel, and 3) whether appellant’s current attorney was appointed or retained. The
trial court is ordered to execute pertinent findings of fact on these matters. Should it be
found that appellant desires to pursue the appeal, is indigent, and his current legal
counsel was appointed, then the trial court is ordered to remove appellant’s current
legal counsel and appoint another to zealously represent appellant’s interest on appeal.
The name, address, phone number, telefax number, and state bar number of the new
attorney must also be included in the court's findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Should it be determined that counsel was retained, then this appellate court will initiate
appropriate disciplinary measures against him to secure compliance with its orders and
the ethical and fiduciary duties due his client. Lastly, the trial court shall also cause to
be developed 1) a supplemental clerk's record containing the findings of fact and
conclusions of law and 2) a reporter's record transcribing the evidence and argument
2 presented at the aforementioned hearing. The foregoing supplemental clerk's and
reporter’s records must be filed by the trial court with the clerk of this court on or before
June 30, 2011. Should additional time be needed to perform these tasks, the trial court
may request same on or before June 30, 2011.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bryant Kessler Jones v. State (Bryant Kessler Jones v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.