Bryant Kessler Jones v. State
This text of Bryant Kessler Jones v. State (Bryant Kessler Jones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-10-0418-CR NO. 07-10-0419-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL B
FEBRUARY 14, 2011 ______________________________
BRYANT KESSLER JONES,
Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellees ______________________________
FROM THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. TWO OF TARRANT COUNTY;
NOS. 1207009R and 1208348R; HON. WAYNE SALVANT, PRESIDING _______________________________
ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND _______________________________
Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK , JJ.
Appellant Bryant Kessler Jones appeals from his convictions for the offenses of
engaging in organized criminal activity, to-wit: murder and aggravated assault with a
deadly weapon, a firearm. On November 4, 2010, the clerk=s record was filed. The
reporter=s record was due on January 18, 2011. On January 25, 2011, this Court notified
the reporter by letter that the record in each case had not been filed and to advise the Court of the status of the record on or before February 4, 2011. To date, no status of the
records nor reporter=s records have been filed.
Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the Criminal District
Court No. 2 of Tarrant County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial
court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a
hearing to determine:
when the reporter=s records can reasonably be transcribed into written form and filed in a manner that does not further delay the prosecution of this appeal or have the practical effect of depriving the appellant of his right to appeal.
The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. So too shall it 1) execute
findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issue, 2) cause to be
developed a supplemental clerk=s record containing its findings of fact and conclusions of
law and all orders it may issue as a result of its hearing in this matter, and 3) cause to be
developed a reporter=s record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the
aforementioned hearing, if any. Additionally, the district court shall then file the
supplemental clerk=s and reporter=s records transcribing the hearing with the clerk of this
court on or before March 16, 2011. Should further time be needed by the trial court to
perform these tasks, then same must be requested before March 16, 2011.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bryant Kessler Jones v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryant-kessler-jones-v-state-texapp-2011.