Bryant, Joshua v. Malco Theaters, Inc.
Opinion
FILED May 27, 2021 09:32 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
CLAIMS
TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT MEMPHIS
JOSHUA BRYANT, ) Docket No. 2020-08-0309 Employee, )
v. ) MALCO THEATERS INC., ) State File No. 97676-2017 Employer, )
And ) LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INS. CO., ) Judge Allen Phillips Carrier. )
COMPENSATION ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT
This case came before the Court on May 17, 2021, on Malco’s Second Motion for Summary Judgment. Malco contended Mr. Bryant filed his Petition for Benefit Determination outside the one-year statute of limitations. For the following reasons, the Court grants the motion.
Facts
On December 14, 2017, Mr. Bryant sustained an injury, and Malco provided medical and temporary total disability benefits. Mr. Bryant filed a Petition for Benefit Determination and then a Request for Expedited Hearing seeking additional benefits.
The Court held an Expedited Hearing, where Malco offered an affidavit of its workers’ compensation claim representative, Joseph Medvescek. In that affidavit, Mr. Medvescek stated in paragraph 9 that he issued the last payment of disability benefits on April 10, 2018, and stated in paragraph 10 that he last paid a medical bill on March 22, 2019. Mr. Bryant offered no contrary evidence.
After the hearing, the Court found that Mr. Bryant filed his petition on March 26, 2020, more than one year after the last payment of benefits on March 22, 2019. Thus, the Court held that Mr. Bryant likely would not prevail at a hearing on the merits because his claim is barred under the applicable statute of limitations. Specifically, under Tennessee
Code Annotated section 50-6-203(b)(2)(2020), an employee must file his petition within one year of when the employer last voluntarily paid benefits.
Afterward, Malco filed its first Motion for Summary Judgment on the grounds of statute of limitations. In support, Malco filed a Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in which it asserted, as relevant, the following: “Employer/Carrier issued the final temporary disability payment on April 10, 2018 and paid the last medical bill on March 22, 2019. (See Exhibit D: Affidavit of Joseph Medvescek ¶¶ 9-10).” However, the affidavit of Mr. Medvescek filed with the motion did not contain paragraphs 9 and 10.
Because of the missing paragraphs, the pleadings and affidavits on file did not show when Malco last paid benefits. Thus, on April 8, 2021, the Court denied Malco’s first Motion for Summary Judgment.
Malco filed this Motion for Summary Judgment on April 14. It included the same Statement of Undisputed Facts and affidavits, but the affidavit of Mr. Medvescek now contained the previously missing paragraphs as to when Malco last paid benefits. Mr. Bryant did not file a response to the motion.
On May 17, the Court heard argument. Malco reiterated that the last payment of benefits was made on March 22, 2019, and that the Petition for Benefit Determination was filed more than one year later on March 26, 2020. Mr. Bryant argued that a physician had related his current complaints to his injury and that the Court should consider that fact as relevant to the statute of limitations.
Analysis
Summary judgment is appropriate “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Tenn. R. Civ. P. 56.04 (2020). To prevail, Malco must do one of two things: (1) submit affirmative evidence that negates an essential element of Mr. Bryant’s claim, or (2) demonstrate that Mr. Bryant’s evidence is insufficient to establish entitlement to further benefits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 20-16-101; see also Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015).
Further, the Appeals Board has stated the filing requirements of Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure 56 “are not mere suggestions,” but plain and unambiguous requirements. Thomas v. Zipp Express, 2017 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 22, at *11 n.4 (Mar. 15, 2017). Specifically, as the moving party, Malco must file a statement of undisputed material facts with citations to the record. Mr. Bryant must respond to Malco’s statement of undisputed facts, stating either his agreement with them or by showing how they are disputed. Tenn. R. Civ. P. 56.03. (Emphasis added)
Here, the essential element of Mr. Bryant’s claim is whether he timely filed the petition. Because Malco voluntarily paid benefits, Mr. Bryant was required to file a petition within one year of when Malco ceased paying benefits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-203(b)(2). Malco asserted in the statement of undisputed facts that it last paid benefits on March 22, 2019, and, unlike in the first motion, that statement is now supported by the affidavit of Mr. Medvescek. Mr. Bryant filed nothing in response. The Court considered his argument at the hearing, but in the absence of a written response to the statement of undisputed facts, the Court must accept Malco’s statements as true.
Therefore, the Court finds no genuine issue of material fact as to when Malco last paid benefits. Because that date was more than one year before Mr. Bryant filed the Petition for Benefit Determination, Malco is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Court grants Malco’s motion for summary judgment and dismisses Mr.
Bryant’s claim with prejudice to its refiling.
2. Unless appealed, this order shall become final in thirty days.
3. The Court assesses the $150.00 filing fee against Malco, for which execution might issue as necessary. Malco shall pay the filing fee to the Court Clerk within five business days of the order becoming final.
4. Malco shall file Form SD-2, Statistical Data form, with the Court Clerk within five business days of this order becoming final.
ENTERED May 27, 2021.
JUDGE ALLEN PHILLIPS Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that a copy of this Order was sent as indicated on May 27, 2021.
Name Via Email Service Sent To:
Joshua Bryant, Employee X 9146 Forest Island Dr., N., Collierville, TN 38017 joshuamusic7@yahoo.com
Effie B. Cozart, X effie.cozart@libertymutual.com Employer’s Attorney kathleen.langston@libertymutual.com
Penny Shrum, Court Clerk Wc.courtcler@tn.gov
Compensation Hearing Order Right to Appeal:
If you disagree with this Compensation Hearing Order, you may appeal to the Workers’
Compensation Appeals Board or the Tennessee Supreme Court. To appeal to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, you must:
1. Complete the enclosed form entitled: “Notice of Appeal,” and file the form with the Clerk of the Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims within thirty calendar days of the date the compensation hearing order was filed. When filing the Notice of Appeal, you must serve a copy upon the opposing party (or attorney, if represented).
2. You must pay, via check, money order, or credit card, a $75.00 filing fee within ten calendar days after filing of the Notice of Appeal. Payments can be made in-person at any Bureau office or by U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or other delivery service. In the alternative, you may file an Affidavit of Indigency (form available on the Bureau’s website or any Bureau office) seeking a waiver of the filing fee. You must file the fullycompleted Affidavit of Indigency within ten calendar days of filing the Notice of Appeal. Failure to timely pay the filing fee or file the Affidavit of Indigency will result in dismissal of your appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2021 TN WC 180 (Bryant, Joshua v. Malco Theaters, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.