Bryant & Heffernan, Inc. v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 350
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJuly 3, 1957
DocketNo. 61007; protests 249816-K, etc. (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 39 Cust. Ct. 350 (Bryant & Heffernan, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bryant & Heffernan, Inc. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 350 (cusc 1957).

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of “Schippach Pencil Clay,” not a ball clay, similar in all material respects to that the subject of Joseph Dixon Crucible Company v. United States (37 Cust. Ct. 157, C. D. 1816), the claim at 50 cents per ton under the provision in paragraph 207, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52820), for unwrought and unmanufactured clay, not specially provided for, other than common blue clay and other ball clay, was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to be the same as the merchandise involved in C. D. 1816, supra, except that the items in question are wrought or manufactured, were held dutiable at $1 per ton under the provision in said paragraph, as modified, supra, for wrought or manufactured clay, not specially provided for, other than common blue clay or other ball clay.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Joseph Dixon Crucible Co. v. United States
37 Cust. Ct. 157 (U.S. Customs Court, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 Cust. Ct. 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryant-heffernan-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1957.