Bryant Et Al. v. North Carolina; And Horn v. North Carolina
This text of 419 U.S. 974 (Bryant Et Al. v. North Carolina; And Horn v. North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Sup. Ct. N. C. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that any state or federal ban on, or regulation of, obscenity is prohibited by the Constitution, Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 508 (Douglas, J., dissenting) ; Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, 42-47 (Douglas, J., dissenting); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70-73 (Douglas, J., dissenting), would grant certio-rari and summarily reverse the judgment. Reported below: No. 73-1811, 285 N. C. 27, 203 S. E. 2d 27; No. 73-1818, 285 N. C. 82, 203 N. E. 2d 36.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
419 U.S. 974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryant-et-al-v-north-carolina-and-horn-v-north-carolina-scotus-1974.