Bryant Et Al. v. North Carolina; And Horn v. North Carolina

419 U.S. 974
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 29, 1974·No. 73-1811; 73-1818·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Sup. Ct. N. C. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that any state or federal ban on, or regulation of, obscenity is prohibited by the Constitution, Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 508 (Douglas, J., dissenting) ; Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, 42-47 (Douglas, J., dissenting); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70-73 (Douglas, J., dissenting), would grant certio-rari and summarily reverse the judgment. Reported below: No. 73-1811, 285 N. C. 27, 203 S. E. 2d 27; No. 73-1818, 285 N. C. 82, 203 N. E. 2d 36.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bryant Et Al. v. North Carolina; And Horn v. North Carolina, 419 U.S. 974 (1974).

419 U.S. 974 (Bryant Et Al. v. North Carolina; And Horn v. North Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Johnston
473 S.E.2d 25 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1996)
People v. Neumayer
275 N.W.2d 230 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1979)