Bryans v. Mabry
72 Ga. 208
Opinion
A notice that “I have applied for and had issued the writ of certiorari returned to the next term,” etc., is not a sufficient compliance with the requirement of section 4059 of the Code that notice shall be given of the sanction of the writ of certiorari. 65 Ga., 303.
(a.) In 67 Ga., 515, the case was different. There the notice showed that the court had taken action upon the petition and had granted the writ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bryans v. Mabry, 72 Ga. 208 (Ga. 1883).
72 Ga. 208 (Bryans v. Mabry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Suggs v. Mutual Investment Co.
155 S.E. 534 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
McConnell v. Folsom Bros.
61 S.E. 1051 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
International Text Book Co. v. Fiel
54 S.E. 360 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Bunn v. Henderson
39 S.E. 78 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Franke v. May
12 S.E. 1068 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1891)