Bryan v. Tatarsky

449 F. App'x 243
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 5, 2011
DocketNo. 11-6539
StatusPublished

This text of 449 F. App'x 243 (Bryan v. Tatarsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bryan v. Tatarsky, 449 F. App'x 243 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Affirmed in unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

T. Terell Bryan appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and granting Appellees’ motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bryan v. Tatarsky, No. 1:08-cv-03556-TLW, 2011 WL 380070 (D.S.C. Feb. 3, 2011). We also deny Bryan’s pending motion to produce. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
449 F. App'x 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryan-v-tatarsky-ca4-2011.