Bryan v. State
This text of 397 So. 2d 1235 (Bryan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant appeals his conviction for sale or delivery of cannabis raising as his sole point on appeal the trial court’s alleged error in refusing to instruct the jury on the maximum and minimum penalties as required by Tascano v. State, 393 So.2d 540 (Fla.1980), rehearing denied February 27, 1981. Appellant’s argument is clearly frivolous since the jury was instructed as required by Tascano, supra. (T-843-846). AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
397 So. 2d 1235, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bryan-v-state-fladistctapp-1981.