Bryan v. State

397 So. 2d 1235, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19752
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 13, 1981·No. No. WW-320·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals his conviction for sale or delivery of cannabis raising as his sole point on appeal the trial court’s alleged error in refusing to instruct the jury on the maximum and minimum penalties as required by Tascano v. State, 393 So.2d 540 (Fla.1980), rehearing denied February 27, 1981. Appellant’s argument is clearly frivolous since the jury was instructed as required by Tascano, supra. (T-843-846). AFFIRMED.

SHAW, WENTWORTH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bryan v. State, 397 So. 2d 1235, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19752 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

397 So. 2d 1235 (Bryan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tascano v. State
393 So. 2d 540 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)