Bryan v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

Fourth Circuit

Bryan v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

376 F. App'x 312

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 28, 2010·No. No. 10-6054·Published

Opinion

[313]*313Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Terence Terell Bryan appeals the district court’s order denying his motion under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bryan v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. 4:06-cv-03358-TLW, 2009 WL 5062404 (D.S.C. Dec. 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[313]*313Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Terence Terell Bryan appeals the district court’s order denying his motion under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bryan v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. 4:06-cv-03358-TLW, 2009 WL 5062404 (D.S.C. Dec. 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Bryan v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, 376 F. App'x 312 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

376 F. App'x 312 (Bryan v. South Carolina Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.