Bryan v. SCDC

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 25, 2010·No. 09-7953·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7953

EDWARD SABARI BRYAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SCDC; JONATHAN E. OZMINT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (3:08-cv-00846-RBH)

Submitted: February 18, 2010 Decided: February 25, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Sabari Bryan, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Blaine Rosbrugh, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Edward Sabari Bryan appeals the district court’s order

adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting

summary judgment for the Defendants on Bryan’s action under 42

U.S.C. § 1983 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Bryan v. SCDC, No. 3:08-cv-00846-RBH

(D.S.C. Sept. 29, 2009). Additionally, we deny Bryan’s motions

to compel and for production of a transcript. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bryan v. SCDC, (4th Cir. 2010).

Bryan v. SCDC (Bryan v. SCDC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related